Sleep

Showing only ideas leading to #5324.

See full discussion​·​See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. You may need to scroll sideways.
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal​·​#5223​·​

Just stumbled upon this tip in my Insta feed to deal with noisy neighbors: https://www.instagram.com/reel/Db4gheyx9WP/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

Apparently you can buy a device that cancels out vibrations in your walls. Not sure I’m understanding exactly how it works.

Criticized1*
Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler MillsOP​·​#5293​·​
2nd of 2 versions leading to #5324 (3 total)

Interesting. But I would guess it only works well for constant sounds. The sensor has to read the waveform to create one that cancels it. Will not do much for short impulses of sound, which are the main offender (my current neighbors are okay, for the record).

Criticism of #5223Criticized2*
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal​·​#5234​·​

Isn’t this a criticism?

Criticism of #5293
Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler MillsOP​·​#5292​·​

Well the device may deal with some noisy neighbors, but sure, a criticism overall. Edited.

Criticism of #5234Criticized1*
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal​·​#5299​·​

Not to be nitpicky, especially since you ended up agreeing, but #5234 now has a pending criticism (yours), yet you acted on the idea. (Or rather, on the suggestion implied by it.) Acting on an idea with pending criticisms is technically the definition of irrationality on V.

I’m purposely not marking this a criticism so the flags don’t flip.

Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler MillsOP​·​#5311​·​

Ah, I marked my agreement in #5292 a criticism to neutralize yours, since I corrected #5293. But I should have revised it to additionally have the existing criticism no longer apply. I'll make a new revision with that change.

Criticized1*
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal​·​#5324​·​

Since you agree that a revision was necessary, I’ve submitted a counter-criticism of #5292 so that this branch of the discussion tree is consistent (#5323). Ideas are immutable; opening a new branch won’t automatically fix broken branches.

The branch now reflects that your action was rational.

Generally speaking, when a revision addresses a criticism, we don’t submit a counter-criticism.

Let me stress ahead of time that this kind of housekeeping may not seem the most fun, but is indispensable in keeping consistent discussion trees. We can learn to enjoy it. We benefit from this kind of housekeeping by being able to look up which ideas we can rationally adopt.

Criticism of #5311