Life Choice: Should Someone Highly Interested in AGI Research Jeopardize Their Existing Career to Pursue It?

Showing only those parts of the discussion that lead to #3894.

See full discussion·See most recent related ideas
  Log in or sign up to participate in this discussion.
With an account, you can revise, criticize, and comment on ideas.

Discussions can branch out indefinitely. Zoom out for the bird’s-eye view.
Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler MillsOP, 8 days ago·#3639

Option 2: Go on hiatus from the day job/career, and focus on creative pursuits and research, full-time, for some number of months (duration perhaps depending on job opportunities).

Battle tested
Zakery Mizell’s avatar
Zakery Mizell, 3 days ago·#3782

Consider your current balance of working and research.

Could you cut other activities, keep the job, and increase focus on research?

Criticism of #3639Criticized1*
Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler MillsOP, 3 days ago·#3819

I think I've compressed other activities as much as possible. With the current job, I don't think I can increase focus on research any further. The concerns are over the tradeoffs of leaving the day job (finances, impact to employability, etc.).

Criticism of #3782
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, 2 days ago·#3834

FWIW, if I was hiring, and I was looking at a resume of someone who always ‘played it safe’ and was very concerned about what others think, I wouldn’t hire them. Whereas I would hire someone who takes smart risks and cares about truth over popularity, even if they have a resume ‘gap’.

Criticism of #3819Criticized1*
Tyler Mills’s avatar
Tyler MillsOP revised about 13 hours ago·#3881
Only version leading to #3894 (3 total)

Still learning the art of Veritula (my bad for combining ideas in #3819). From the top, this branch seems to be:
Go on hiatus?
- No hiatus, compress activates
----- Yes hiatus, can't compress. No hiatus because resume gap.
--------- No to resume gap -- So YES hiatus. But currently #3834 flows up and flips to a no-hiatus criticism (because I melded a yes and a no idea in one comment, and Dennis criticized the latter).
------------- Yes hiatus via this comment to correct

"It’s best to write only one criticism at a time."
----- Best, or required, to avoid errors?! (or I'm confused)

Criticism of #3834
Dennis Hackethal’s avatar
Dennis Hackethal, about 4 hours ago·#3894

… my bad for combining ideas in #3819 …

No worries, and good catch. What you could do, to clean up this branch, is revise #3819 to remove this part:

The concerns are over the tradeoffs of leaving the day job (finances, impact to employability, etc.).

And then, before submitting the revision form, uncheck criticism #3834 underneath the form.