Search ideas
1199 ideas match your query.:
Another problem with the term ‘statement’ is that not every statement encodes knowledge. Only some statements do.
Recall Deutsch’s definitions of knowledge (paraphrasing from memory): information with causal power; information which, once instantiated, causes itself to remain instantiated.
The sentence ‘nice weather we’re having’ is a statement but doesn’t meet those definitions of knowledge.
Or the existing search page could be filtered by discussion. For example, I could link to that page with an additional query param discussion_id=1
or something like that.
Or each discussion could have a search/filter form to filter ideas not just by criticized or not but also content and potentially other attributes.
Superseded by #1790. This comment was generated automatically.
Feature to collapse all criticized ideas of a discussion? Useful for todo lists.
Feature to collapse all criticized ideas on a page? Useful for todo lists.
Make sure cycling between a leaf revision with children and a leaf revision without children properly toggles the gutter.
Cycling through the revisions of a leaf reveals its gutter, which should be hidden since it’s a leaf.
Sometimes you just want to hide the comments without collapsing the parent idea.
Superseded by #1783. This comment was generated automatically.
Because that would mean hiding each comment individually if you ever do want to hide all comments of an idea.
Because that would mean hiding each comment individually if you ever do want to hide all comments of an idea. And sometimes you just want to hide the comments without collapsing the parent idea.
Having features to both collapse an idea and hide all its comments seems like an opportunity for unification. Why not just go with collapsing and remove the ability to hide all comments?
As noted in #1777, fetching the idea actually helps. Well worth the overhead.
This actually helps to prevent rendering links with IDs that don’t point to any existing idea.
Superseded by #1775. This comment was generated automatically.
Include (preview of) content in idea URLs: '/ideas/123-first-30-or-so-chars-of-idea-here'.
Wouldn’t even need friendly ID for that since the URL would contain the ID. Would only need to override to_param
to concatenate the idea’s ID and content.
Seems like minor overhead. It’s not like there are tons of user-generated hashtags everywhere.
Superseded by #1771. This comment was generated automatically.
Fetching the idea is not necessary if the feature is backwards compatible. Can still just use /ideas/123.
Not if the feature is backwards compatible.